Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, has been granted interim bail until June 1 by the Supreme Court to participate in the current Lok Sabha elections. Despite acknowledging that 21 days won’t significantly impact the arguments of the Enforcement Directorate against the interim bail, the court has imposed strict conditions on Kejriwal’s activities during his release from Tihar Jail.
Arvind Kejriwal Gets Interim Bail
Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi and leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), was given temporary freedom by the Supreme Court until June 1. This relates to a case about moving money illegally connected to liquor policies.
The court allowed him to leave jail to campaign for the ongoing Lok Sabha elections, but he must return to jail on June 2. Many AAP supporters are excitedly waiting for him to step out of Tihar jail in Delhi after the court’s decision.
Also Read: PM Modi Expresses Anger Over Sam Pitroda’s Racist Remark
Arvind Kejriwal’s Release Legal Process
Arvind Kejriwal’s release from Tihar jail depends on several legal steps, primarily getting a written bail order from the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court also provided guidelines for his bail. According to these guidelines, Kejriwal’s lawyer must submit a bail bond of Rs 50,000 and a surety of the same amount directly to the Tihar Jail Superintendent, without needing to go to the trial court.
Kejriwal’s lawyers will bring the bail order from the Supreme Court to the jail to facilitate his release. If these steps are completed on time, Kejriwal could be out by this evening, according to a source in Tihar jail.
Supreme Court Guidelines for Arvind Kejriwal Interim Bail
Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, must follow five conditions set by the Supreme Court for his bail:
- He needs to submit bail bonds worth Rs 50,000 and have someone as a surety for the same amount, approved by the Jail Superintendent.
- He can’t go to his office or the Delhi Secretariat.
- He agreed not to sign official papers unless necessary for the Lieutenant Governor’s approval.
- He must refrain from commenting on the case he’s involved in, particularly the Delhi liquor policy case, for which he was arrested on March 21 by the Enforcement Directorate.
- He’s not allowed to communicate with witnesses or access official documents related to the Delhi liquor policy case.
AAP Celebration on Arvind Kejriwal Bail
Outside the AAP headquarters in New Delhi, there was a lively celebration as news of the Chief Minister’s temporary release spread. Workers cheered, chanting slogans like “Kejriwal freed, jail locks broken,” while dancing with joy.
AAP praised the Supreme Court’s decision, affirming that truth may face challenges but will ultimately prevail.
“The truth cannot be defeated. We welcome the Supreme Court’s decision. This marks the end of dictatorship. Truth prevails,” stated AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh in a Hindi tweet on X. It’s worth noting that Sanjay Singh, implicated in the same liquor policy case, has also been granted bail by the Supreme Court.
The liquor policy case, which has embroiled numerous AAP leaders, revolves around allegations of corruption and money laundering in the development and implementation of Delhi government’s now-defunct excise policy for 2021-22.
Arvind Kejriwal Gets Interim Bail FAQs
Q.1. Why was Arvind Kejriwal granted interim bail?
Ans. The Supreme Court granted him bail until June 1 to participate in the ongoing Lok Sabha elections.
Q.2. What conditions did the Supreme Court impose on Kejriwal’s release?
Ans. Conditions include submitting bail bonds, refraining from office visits, and avoiding comments on the case.
Q.3. When must Kejriwal return to jail?
Ans. Kejriwal is required to return to jail on June 2 after his temporary release.
Q.4. What is the liquor policy case involving Kejriwal?
Ans. It involves allegations of corruption and money laundering related to Delhi’s excise policy for 2021-22.
Q.5. How did AAP react to Kejriwal’s interim bail?
Ans. AAP celebrated the decision, stating that truth prevails and welcoming the end of what they called “dictatorship.”