Famous YouTuber Elvish Yadav is in the spotlight again due to a case involving snake venom. On September 5, 2024, the 26-year-old social media influencer went to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) office in Lucknow to answer questions about the case. Earlier, he had asked for an extra three days to appear, which was granted.
This is not the first time Elvish has been questioned. He was also interrogated in July. The ED is trying to find out where Elvish got the snake venom and how he was involved in supplying it at rave parties.
In addition to this, a case has been filed against him under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in Lucknow. This follows a First Information Report (FIR) that was filed by the Noida Police, which is part of the investigation.
Elvish Yadav Questioned by ED in Money Laundering Case
Popular YouTuber and Bigg Boss OTT 2 winner Elvish Yadav was questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Thursday. This was related to an investigation into money laundering connected to a snake venom-rave party case.
The ED, which is a government agency that deals with financial crimes, held the questioning at its office in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. This is the second time this year that Yadav has been questioned by the ED. The first time was in July, when he was interrogated for nearly seven hours by the agency’s officials.
The ED started looking into this case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in May. They did so because a significant amount of money was involved in the snake venom-rave party scandal.
Earlier this year, on March 17, Yadav was arrested and spent 14 days in judicial custody. He was then released on bail by a local court just five days after his arrest.
Also Read: Elvish Yadav To Face Money Laundering Case, Filed By ED
Elvish Yadav Money Laundering Case
Elvish Yadav, a 26-year-old YouTuber and winner of Bigg Boss OTT 2, is currently facing legal issues. He has been booked by Noida Police under several laws, including the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, the Wildlife Protection Act, and the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
The case originated from a complaint filed on November 3 last year by an animal rights representative from the NGO People for Animals (PFA) at Noida’s Sector 49 police station. Yadav was named in an FIR alongside five other individuals, all of whom are snake charmers. The snake charmers were arrested in November but later received bail from a local court.
Although Yadav denied the allegations as “baseless and fake,” the police eventually dropped the NDPS Act charges against him, admitting it was a mistake. Following his questioning in July, an official revealed that the agency was not satisfied with Yadav’s responses and planned to question him further.
Additionally, Yadav’s close associate, Haryana singer Rahul Yadav (known as Fazilpuriya), was questioned for several hours at the ED Lucknow office on July 8.
Also Read: Elvish Yadav Snake Venom Case: Noida Police Files 1200-Page Chargesheet
FAQs
Q.1. What is the latest update on Elvish Yadav’s case?
Ans. Elvish Yadav recently appeared at the ED office in Lucknow for questioning related to a money laundering investigation tied to a snake venom-rave party scandal.
Q.2. Why was Elvish Yadav questioned by the Enforcement Directorate?
Ans. He was questioned regarding his alleged involvement in a money laundering case connected to the distribution of snake venom at rave parties.
Q.3. What are the charges against Elvish Yadav?
Ans. Yadav faces charges under various laws, including the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), following a previous FIR filed by Noida Police for related offenses.
Q.4. When was Elvish Yadav first interrogated by the ED?
Ans. Yadav was first questioned by the Enforcement Directorate in July 2024, and he appeared again on September 5, 2024, for further questioning.
Q.5. What was the outcome of the previous charges against Elvish Yadav?
Ans. The initial charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act were dropped after the police admitted they were mistakenly filed.
